Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ruben Bemelmans vs Nick Kyrgios Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bemelmans vs Kyrgios analysis and find out who is favored!
Ruben Bemelmans vs Nick Kyrgios Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bemelmans 1 - 1 Kyrgios
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bemelmans has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kyrgios has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kyrgios has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kyrgios has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kyrgios winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84). Kyrgios has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 169/ 78), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bemelmans winning 1 times and Kyrgios being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 3 and Kyrgios winning 3. The last match between Bemelmans and Kyrgios was at the European Open - Antwerp, 18-10-2017, Second, I.hard with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bemelmans and Kyrgios have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bemelmans winning 1 times and Kyrgios 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bemelmans winning 0, and Kyrgios 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kyrgios has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kyrgios has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kyrgios has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass1
470
Rank
13
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
57% (552-419)
Career Total W/L
66% (268-136)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,013,488
Career Prize Money
$9,640,145
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ruben Bemelmans vs Nick Kyrgios For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bemelmans VS Kyrgios
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Nick Kyrgios |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 32 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 32 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:48 | 1:40:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (129/189) | 67% (114/171) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (93/129) | 72% (82/114) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (33/60) | 56% (32/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 25% (4/16) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (57/171) | 33% (63/189) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Nick Kyrgios
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
18
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
14
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Nick Kyrgios |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Kyrgios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Nick Kyrgios
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
5
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 10-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
22
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Nick Kyrgios
60%
(
99 of
166)
1st Serve %
72%
(
115 of
160)
30
Aces
31
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
91 of
115)
64%
(
43 of
67)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
28%
(
47 of
166)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
48 of
160)
167
Total Points Won
159
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Daniil Medvedev
71%
(
85 of
120)
1st Serve %
59%
(
75 of
127)
21
Aces
22
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
56 of
75)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
40 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
127)
128
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(11) 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Jeff Wolf
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
21
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
64%
(
86 of
134)
1st Serve %
61%
(
86 of
140)
30
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
55 of
86)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
33%
(
44 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
54 of
140)
144
Total Points Won
130
|
7-6(3) 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
13
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
51 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
13 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Bemelmans Vs Kyrgios Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bemelmans are available here and Kyrgios photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
